MS pushes up release date of Windows 7

Published by Yoni • January 20th, 2008 RSS News Feed

Microsoft is making a move

Industry sources are indicating that Microsoft plans to release Windows 7 (the follow up to Visa) in 2009, one year earlier than anticipated. Microsoft might be anxious to roll out a new update to its OS after the lukewarm reception had by Vista.

Microsoft, however, would be well-warned not to rush and push an unfinished product out the door. if you recall, Microsoft initially began working on what would become Vista in 2001. The project, initially codenamed “Longhorn”, was hampered by continuous delays and bugs, and when it was finally released, the public was less than thrilled. PC World even ranked it as the biggest tech disappointment of 2007. Tech analysts, and even Steve Ballmer himself, point out that Microsoft, in developing Vista, was trying to do too much, and as a result, the project was plagued with numerous delays and glitches.

Microsoft has hopefully learned its lesson and will now attempt to deliver incremental, yet value laden, OS updates that will actually get users excited.

Itola Author

Yoni is a business / tax attorney from the windy city. Yoni is also a gadget enthusiast who enjoys writing in the third person.
Email this author | All posts by Yoni

RSS feed | Trackback URI

5 Comments »

2008-01-20 13:07:36

[...] read more | digg story [...]

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by sewing
2008-11-05 09:12:16

jyhgo xdjiubv hastjbr cbyrzk

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Comment by sewing on buttone
2008-11-06 06:36:12

wgtu

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
2008-11-08 21:16:50

rlndbq aywekmu tpyksah zqxepbt

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
2008-11-24 07:42:22

duwepkf ovbcz kqud

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
Name
E-mail
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.