<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digg&#8217;s Double-Edged Sword</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itola.com/internet/diggs-double-edged-sword/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itola.com/internet/diggs-double-edged-sword/</link>
	<description>Information Technology and Business News from the heart of Silicon Valley</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 17:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gerard&#8217;s Projects : links for 2008-01-29</title>
		<link>http://itola.com/internet/diggs-double-edged-sword/#comment-154</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerard&#8217;s Projects : links for 2008-01-29</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 23:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itola.com/technology/diggs-double-edged-sword/#comment-154</guid>
		<description>[...] Digg’s Double-Edged Sword - Internet - Business and Technology - Itola Tech News (tags: socialmedia digg) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Digg’s Double-Edged Sword - Internet - Business and Technology - Itola Tech News (tags: socialmedia digg) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norski</title>
		<link>http://itola.com/internet/diggs-double-edged-sword/#comment-149</link>
		<dc:creator>Norski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 17:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itola.com/technology/diggs-double-edged-sword/#comment-149</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this post. And, for a detailed discussion of DIGG and their decision-making process. 

I signed up with DIGG, and will probably touch base there again this year. It's a fine website for people living in San Francisco’s Potrero Hill neighborhood and their friends: but that's all it is. 

A not-altogether-unreasonable comparison would be the Royal Ascot. There's nothing wrong with the race, and it's been a fine occasion for British ladies to show off their new hats. But a son-of-an-Irishman like me has about as much place there as a skunk in a flower shop. Outside the stables, of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this post. And, for a detailed discussion of DIGG and their decision-making process. </p>
<p>I signed up with DIGG, and will probably touch base there again this year. It&#8217;s a fine website for people living in San Francisco’s Potrero Hill neighborhood and their friends: but that&#8217;s all it is. </p>
<p>A not-altogether-unreasonable comparison would be the Royal Ascot. There&#8217;s nothing wrong with the race, and it&#8217;s been a fine occasion for British ladies to show off their new hats. But a son-of-an-Irishman like me has about as much place there as a skunk in a flower shop. Outside the stables, of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zaibatsu</title>
		<link>http://itola.com/internet/diggs-double-edged-sword/#comment-148</link>
		<dc:creator>Zaibatsu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 07:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itola.com/technology/diggs-double-edged-sword/#comment-148</guid>
		<description>Our debate was never that much about us, I can drive a 2 -3 Fp stories per day every.  It's about the mid-level digger that have worked so hard to make a name for themselves. Revolt or no revolt, I just wanted to help. I should have just STFU and start submitting more Top 10, cutest pic or Apple fanboy diggbait posts.

Zai</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our debate was never that much about us, I can drive a 2 -3 Fp stories per day every.  It&#8217;s about the mid-level digger that have worked so hard to make a name for themselves. Revolt or no revolt, I just wanted to help. I should have just STFU and start submitting more Top 10, cutest pic or Apple fanboy diggbait posts.</p>
<p>Zai</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digg Gaming Now Required, Thanks For Playing! - Blogging - Business and Technology - Itola Tech News</title>
		<link>http://itola.com/internet/diggs-double-edged-sword/#comment-146</link>
		<dc:creator>Digg Gaming Now Required, Thanks For Playing! - Blogging - Business and Technology - Itola Tech News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 06:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itola.com/technology/diggs-double-edged-sword/#comment-146</guid>
		<description>[...] If you enjoyed the article, you might like the following:  Digg&#8217;s Double-Edged Sword [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If you enjoyed the article, you might like the following:  Digg&#8217;s Double-Edged Sword [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digidave</title>
		<link>http://itola.com/internet/diggs-double-edged-sword/#comment-145</link>
		<dc:creator>Digidave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 01:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itola.com/technology/diggs-double-edged-sword/#comment-145</guid>
		<description>The transparency I'm talking about are: Secret editors, auto-buried sites and banned users.

Digg has a right to do any of those: They can have editors, decide certain sites are not good for the community to promote and ban users -- but they should let us know IF they employ the first two, WHY they decide certain sites aren't good and finally: Respond to emails from people who are banned and think it is unfair.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The transparency I&#8217;m talking about are: Secret editors, auto-buried sites and banned users.</p>
<p>Digg has a right to do any of those: They can have editors, decide certain sites are not good for the community to promote and ban users &#8212; but they should let us know IF they employ the first two, WHY they decide certain sites aren&#8217;t good and finally: Respond to emails from people who are banned and think it is unfair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reed</title>
		<link>http://itola.com/internet/diggs-double-edged-sword/#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator>Reed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 00:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itola.com/technology/diggs-double-edged-sword/#comment-144</guid>
		<description>"garbage blog posts that essentially quote other sites and write 1-2 lines of their own commentary."  -- those posts have got to go!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;garbage blog posts that essentially quote other sites and write 1-2 lines of their own commentary.&#8221;  &#8212; those posts have got to go!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred Soto</title>
		<link>http://itola.com/internet/diggs-double-edged-sword/#comment-143</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred Soto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 23:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itola.com/technology/diggs-double-edged-sword/#comment-143</guid>
		<description>I agree, the secrecy is pretty annoying on some levels but in order to stay ahead of the game they kind of have to be quiet about changes.  Gaming is one of the core problems with Digg and more transparency yields more gaming.  The problem for diggers that devote a lot of time to the community is that the secrecy throws them out of their element.  In a way, it kind of is a game to be a 'top digger' because Digg keeps you guessing and having to do a dance to get onto the front page with your good stuff.  It's a difficult subject to tackle but I do think that too many high quality articles are slipping through the cracks and too many b.s. articles are hitting the front page. 

Recent changes have put an end to some of the garbage blog posts that essentially quote other sites and write 1-2 lines of their own commentary.  However, the quality writings of some bloggers and media are still tough to crack the front page because of lack of name recognition which defeats the purpose of perusing the internet for quality content to share with friends / community.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, the secrecy is pretty annoying on some levels but in order to stay ahead of the game they kind of have to be quiet about changes.  Gaming is one of the core problems with Digg and more transparency yields more gaming.  The problem for diggers that devote a lot of time to the community is that the secrecy throws them out of their element.  In a way, it kind of is a game to be a &#8216;top digger&#8217; because Digg keeps you guessing and having to do a dance to get onto the front page with your good stuff.  It&#8217;s a difficult subject to tackle but I do think that too many high quality articles are slipping through the cracks and too many b.s. articles are hitting the front page. </p>
<p>Recent changes have put an end to some of the garbage blog posts that essentially quote other sites and write 1-2 lines of their own commentary.  However, the quality writings of some bloggers and media are still tough to crack the front page because of lack of name recognition which defeats the purpose of perusing the internet for quality content to share with friends / community.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://itola.com/internet/diggs-double-edged-sword/#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 23:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itola.com/technology/diggs-double-edged-sword/#comment-142</guid>
		<description>what transparency is being demanded of Digg?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what transparency is being demanded of Digg?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digidave</title>
		<link>http://itola.com/internet/diggs-double-edged-sword/#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator>Digidave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 23:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itola.com/technology/diggs-double-edged-sword/#comment-141</guid>
		<description>The debate is less about the algorithm change and more about Digg's ability to be transparent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The debate is less about the algorithm change and more about Digg&#8217;s ability to be transparent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.404 seconds -->
